Theoretical insight into complexation between cyclocarbons and C60 fullerene

25 April 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

This work conducts the comprehensive theoretical study on the non-covalent complexation between cyclocarbons of different sizes and C60 fullerene for the first time. The binding energy between cyclocarbons and C60 fullerene is observed to be significantly stronger than that between two C18 or two C60 fullerenes, indicating a particularly strong affinity between them. The cyclocarbons and C60 fullerene can spontaneously assemble into non-covalent complexes characterized by - stacking in the gas phase at room temperature, and the hydrophobic effect caused by the solvent environment can promote this binding. From C18 to C34, the binding strength with C60 fullerene increases almost linearly with the increase of cyclocarbon size, and the C34@C60 dimer exhibits a perfect nano-Saturn structure. By studying the trimers of 2:1 form between cyclocarbons and C60 fullerene, it is observed that as the ring size increases, the angle between the two cyclocarbons gradually decreases. In the largest trimer we studied, C60@2C34, the fullerene is symmetrically surrounded by two cyclocarbons. The results on the trimers formed by cyclocarbon and C60 fullerenes in a 1:2 ratio showed when the size of the cyclocarbon sandwiched between two fullerenes is not quite large, the trimers exhibit an ideal dumbbell-like structure, and the presence of the first fullerene has a significant synergistic effect on the binding of the second one. Combined with the analysis of interaction energy and van der Waals potential, we found that the cyclocarbon greatly promotes the non-covalent dimerization of fullerenes, which acted as a “molecular glue”.

Keywords

cyclocarbon
fullerene
non-covalent interaction
pi-pi stacking
binding energy
interaction energy

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
xyz-files.rar
Description
xyz files of all studied complexes involved in this work.
Actions
Title
Supplemental Information.pdf
Description
Optimized geometry of two configurations of C60@C18 dimer, deformation energy and binding energies (kcal/mol) of C60@Cn (n = 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 36) dimers, relationship between area of IGMH ginter isosurface of 0.002 a.u. and binding energy of C60@Cn (n = 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, and 34), conformational superpositions of C36 in isolated state and after complexation with fullerene.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.