JUDICIAL ENFORCEMENT BY SOCIAL ASPECTS

02 January 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Nowadays, mortality loses its importance. Moral behaviour, and religion have become an alternative. In the public consciousness, religion and morality play second fiddle to law, which is contrary to the use of public discourse. In every rule of law, however, law and its enforcement not a matter of choice. Law is mandatory for all people without exception – as The Fundamental Law of Hungary also sets it out. The main objective of my study is to combine the judicial enforcement with the social network in Hungary, as a system, based on solidarity, given that no particular attention has been paid to this so far. Apart from some measures (debt management programme, National Asset Management Programme), the involvement of the social network in the enforcement procedure has not taken place, although it could be extremely important in particular when judgment debtors are on the verge of eviction.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.