De-historicization of “Wandering Womb”: A Study of Freudian Intervention

12 September 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

Hysteria, a mysterious symptom registers a lot of experiments and discourses for centuries to ultimately render erroneous arguments and a lack of scientific exuberance. The connotation of hysteria had a very gendered perspective and the entire discourse was based on the physicality of the sufferers. The intervention of Freud completely changed the discourse of hysteria. Hence, I propose to study the trajectory of hysteria from the ancient time through the Middle Ages through the 16th and 17th centuries to the Freudian intervention to signify the importance of Freud in order to create a reference point, using which the later scientists could develop the scientific technique to treat hysteria. In this paper, I would also study the modern interpretation of hysteria and the great role played by Freud in the academic understanding of hysteria.

Keywords

Hysteria
History of Hysteria
Freud's contribution in hysteria

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.