African Sovereignty: Constructing Institutional and Structural Changes in the International System

05 May 2025, Version 4
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Can international organizations (IOs) possess sovereignty like modern states? How can IOs obtain sovereignty? Can IOs supersede states as dominant political structures in the international system? Neorealists theorize that European sovereignty practice is changing the institution and rules of sovereignty, indicating that IOs as structures of political organization, particularly the European Union, can gain sovereignty through formal agreements among states and eventually supplant sovereign states. I study the emerging African sovereignty practice in relations between the African Union (AU) and the UN amidst the legitimation crisis in the UN Security Council and provide the constructivist alternative theory: IOs can attain sovereignty when dominant IOs like the UN face legitimation crises and states constituting IOs claim sovereignty. African sovereignty practice shows that sovereignty claims can occur because of noncompliance with IO legitimation rules of inclusive representation, or the alignment of values, norms, priorities, interests, or goals.

Keywords

sovereignty
constructivism
African Union
Africa
international organization
legitimation
regionalism
international authority

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.