"Revisiting J.S. Mill's Case for Civil Dialogue in the Age of Partisan Division: Its Utility for Teaching Political Theory" Prepared for Civic Engagement TLC2020

31 January 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

John Stuart Mill’s essay, On Liberty (1859) grapples with a familiar problem; namely, how to determine “the nature and the limits of power which can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual.” Today, even more than in Mill’s time, with the proliferation of partisan websites and social media outlets, it is tyranny, not merely of princes, but of polarized public opinion expressed in ‘virtual’ communities, confirming rather than challenging social and political beliefs that—we must now be on guard. Mill’s case in seeking truth depends on vigorous debate, but applying his liberal philosophy may be easier said than done. This paper considers both the possibilities and limitations of putting his philosophy of education into practice when using a tutorial method for teaching political theory.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.