Comparative Politics

The end of the backsliding paradigm? Avoiding reverse “transitology” in Central and Eastern Europe



This paper critiques some of the underlying assumptions of what we call the “backsliding paradigm”. Mirroring Thomas Carothers’s (2002a) famous critique of the “transition paradigm”, we argue that the current debate on democratic regression in Central and Eastern Europe runs the risk of becoming a “reverse transition paradigm” as it presents some of the same limitations. We discuss five such limitations as an invitation for other scholars to engage in debate on how we can study (un) democratic developments in the region in a broader way, accounting for the range of different, complex and even paradoxical trajectories its countries display.


Thumbnail image of BackslidingParadigm_preprint0420.pdf


Log in or register with APSA to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .

Comment number 1, Licia Cianetti: Jan 14, 2021, 09:16

An updated version of this working paper has been published as "The End of the Backsliding Paradigm" on Journal of Democracy 32 (1) 2021.