American Government and Politics

Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19

Christopher Adolph University of Washington
,
Kenya Amano University of Washington
,
Bree Bang-Jensen University of Washington
,
Nancy Fullman University of Washington
,
John Wilkerson University of Washington
Abstract
Social distancing policies are critical but economically painful measures to flatten the curve against emergent infectious diseases. As the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19 spread throughout the United States in early 2020, the federal government issued social distancing recommendations but left to the states the most difficult and consequential decisions restricting behavior, such as canceling events, closing schools and businesses, and issuing stay-at-home orders. We present an original dataset of state-level social distancing policy responses to the epidemic and explore how political partisanship, COVID-19 caseload, and policy diffusion explain the timing of governors’ decisions to mandate social distancing. An event history analysis of five social distancing policies across all fifty states reveals the most important predictors are political: all else equal, Republican governors and governors from states with more Trump supporters were slower to adopt social distancing policies. These delays are likely to produce significant, on-going harm to public health.
Content
Supplementary weblinks
COVID-19 State Social-Distancing Policy
Data on social distancing policies enacted in the US states in response to COVID-19, updated daily by a team of researchers at the University of Washington, Seattle.