Abstract
Do reserved seats yield substantive representation for traditionally marginalized groups?
To answer that question, we examine reserved seats for Native American tribes in the Maine
legislature. Tribal representatives, who can participate in debate but lack a vote, have represented
tribes in Maine's predominantly white legislature since statehood in 1820. We take advantage of
a 1995 rule change that allowed tribal representatives to initiate legislation, and an original dataset
of pro-tribal bills, to estimate the effect of reserved seats on the production of pro-tribal bills. We
find that once tribal representatives were allowed to write bills, they produced over half of all
tribal-related legislation during a 35-year period. Legislators with tribal constituents sponsored
fewer relevant bills after the reform but continued to cosponsor pro-tribal legislation. Although
our results are promising, we caution that reserved seats are not a panacea for improving
indigenous representation.
