Representation in Politics: Transcendental Dreaming and Existential Crisis

19 August 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

This paper focuses on what Voegelin calls “unrestrained modernity” alongside an exploration of the problem of infinity in language representations discussed by Aristotle in Physics. Focusing my search on unlimited-representation leads me towards a discussion of what tradition is, how one represents traditions both in life and politics, and how modern traditions have failed to transcend beyond the occasion of their becoming, ultimately leading towards an existential crisis. For Voegelin, the failure of transcendental social representation creates the “phenomenon of a dream world” that leads to the ‘end of modernity.’ The institutional traditions most important for this paper are those of western representative democracies. Thus, the paper (1) aims at understanding how, for Voegelin, the threat of “unrestrained modernity” brings about “strong institutional traditions” of economic materialism, racism, corrupt psychology, scientism and technological ruthlessness, and (2) developing a means of helping us overcome the menace of dangerous socio-political conventions.

Keywords

Voegelin
Political theory
Hermeneutics
Representation
Aristotle
Foucault
Ontology
Epistemology
Justice
Contemporary

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.