Drivers and Limiters of Policy Change: Interest Group Competition and Path Dependence in State Charter School Policies

24 August 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Policies change slowly and incrementally after enactment, if they change at all. Notions of path dependence hold that the influence early decisions and institutional designs hold over policy prevent serious change. Early decision lock-in ways in which benefitting interests interact with institutions regarding the policy. Policies are therefore highly resistant to efforts of interest groups, lawmakers, and even the public to change their trajectories. I test the influence of path dependent inertia versus ongoing efforts of interest groups regarding the shape of charter school policies in the American states from 1996 to 2016. I find that strict notions of path dependence do not manifest in charter policies, and that pressure from competing interest groups starts to emerge a few years after enactment, influence that can slowly start to change the arc of a policy’s development despite the influence of institutions and expectations set at the time of its enactment.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.