Political Legitimacy and Worldwide Terrorist Attacks, 1970-2017

27 August 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The classic work by Max Weber argued for the impact of political legitimacy on reducing conflict and violence within states. Based on Weber and more recent theorists we argue that governments whose legitimacy is undermined are more vulnerable to terrorist attacks. Using data on worldwide terrorist attacks from the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) and measures of good governance from the Varieties of Democracy Project (V-Dem), we find considerable (but not total) support for the impact of legitimacy on terrorist attacks. We perform fixed-effects negative binomial regressions of domestic terrorist attacks covering 131 countries from 1970-2017 to test the impact of four political legitimacy measures: accountability, efficiency, procedural and distributive fairness. Controlling for common economic, political and demographic measures, we find that from all legitimacy measures, accountability has the most robust influence: rates of domestic terrorist attacks are highest when governments are transitioning from highly unaccountable to highly accountable systems.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.