The Origins of Political Behavior, and the First Political System

31 August 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

David Easton understood that the political system is an emergent property of political behavior. But, when did the first political behavior emerge in human evolution? How did that happen? How can this be known? Political theory finds itself looking way back, and answering these, and other, questions.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, William Kelleher: Sep 07, 2023, 21:42

This working paper has now become Chapter Two of my new book, Normative Political Science - An Exciting New Way to do Poli Sci Research. This paper/Chapter discusses the possible origins of the pattern of political behavior that constitutes a "political system" as Easton defines it. Easton intended his theory of the political system to guide empirical research, but he didn't address the question as to how the first political system could have emerged. Nor did he see that the conceptual framework he wrote about could also be used as a standard by which to assess how well a political system is working. The idea of operational goodness is developed in the book. See more at, https://a.co/d/9jdoVUg