A Partisan Right to Harm Others?

24 September 2020, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

American politics is characterized by two trends: social problems are framed as issues of competing rights which tends to obscure the costs and obligations associated with the exercise of individual rights, and partisan sorting has led to partisan polarization. This study claims that when issues are framed in terms of partisan rights, partisans are likely to assert co-partisans’ “rights” to engage in socially destructive behavior but deny the same “rights” to out-partisans. We test these hypotheses using three framing experiments referencing both politicized and non-political issues. The results show that partisans deny out-partisans’ right not to wear a mask, but assert co-partisans’ right to smoke in public. When it comes to a partisan right to own guns over out-partisans’ right to be free of gun violence, Republicans both deny democrats gun rights and assert their own, while Democrats only deny Republicans’ right to arms.

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Appendix
Description
Appendix
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Renzo Gracie Garwood: Mar 03, 2021, 03:17

Hi, thanks for this really thorough article. I enjoyed reading it and I will make good use of it.