Comparative Politics

Electoral Opportunism: Disentangling Myopia and Moderation



A central component of representative democracy, competitive elections imply that political incumbents face uncertainty about being re-elected into office. This study jointly considers two types of opportunistic behavior that may be triggered by such uncertainty—policy myopia and policy moderation—which hitherto have been the focus of separate research traditions. Disentangling the two behaviors theoretically and empirically, we evaluate their prevalence in economic policy-making among Swedish local governments. To this end, we apply a new measure of electoral competitiveness that captures the incumbent government’s re-election probability, for which plausibly exogenous variation is generated by exploiting national-level vote intention polls. We find a substantial moderating effect of competitiveness on incumbents’ tax rate decisions—shifting policy towards the median voter—but little evidence of policy myopia. Further corroborated by original survey evidence on politicians’ perceptions of their re-election prospects and opportunistic policy options, these findings challenge the widespread notion that electoral opportunism is inherently short-sighted.


Thumbnail image of Cronert & Nyman (2021) Electoral Opportunism - Maintext.pdf

Supplementary material

Thumbnail image of Cronert & Nyman (2021) Electoral Opportunism - SI.pdf
Supporting Information
Supporting information


Log in or register with APSA to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .