Public Policy

Can unconditional cash transfers encourage voters to cast ballots? Evidence from elections in Brazil

Authors

Abstract

Low-income voters are typically underrepresented in elections. Even in countries adopting compulsory voting, there is a consolidated pattern of voter turnout decline among the poor. I argue that implementing an unconditional cash transfer (UCT) can decrease both direct and indirect costs of voting and thus enhance the electoral participation of low-income voters. I test these claims by leveraging Maricá’s unconditional cash transfer (MUCT), the largest UCT in Latin America implemented in Brazil in 2013. Causal estimates from a difference-in-differences design show that voter abstention decreased by 15% after the cash transfer intervention in Maricá. Furthermore, the share of undecided voters - typically those who decide to discard their votes instead of voting for one of the candidates displayed on the ballot - decreased by 33% after the MUCT implementation. These findings suggest that paying periodic unconditional benefits can mobilize low-income voters and encourage them to participate in elections.

Content

Thumbnail image of Araújo_Victor_UCT_abstention_Maricá_Brazil.pdf

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Log in or register with APSA to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .