Normative Political Science – How to Measure the Goodness of a Political System

28 July 2021, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

As is well known, David Easton defines the political system as emerging from those social interactions undertaken in relation to the authoritative allocation of values for a society. This paper explains two normative services that Easton’s definition can provide for political science; one is explanatory, the other evaluative. The explanatory service is to show both the distinctiveness of political science as a social science and to serve as a standard, or norm, by which to set the boundaries of the profession’s subject matter. Secondly, Easton’s theory of the political system as an input/output model can serve as a standard by which to assess the “goodness” of a political system, and for comparing the goodness of systems. Assessing such goodness is not a matter of moral approval or approbation, but more like the taxonomist assessing the goodness of a specimen, as to both its categorical fit and its health.

Keywords

Easton
Evaluation of Political Systems
Normative Political Science

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, William Kelleher: Sep 05, 2023, 21:36

Now revised and expanded to a book: Normative Political Science. The framework is explained. Chapter 5 applies it to the evaluation of the Chinese political system. The book's concluding chapter shows how the framework can be used as diagnostic tool for pinpointing the causes of below par performances of a political system. Then remedial hypotheses can be suggested by political science researchers. Concerned not with the "health" but with the operational goodness of a system, the political wisdom resulting from the method will raise respect for the profession to the level of the NIH or the WBO.