Political Theory

Normative Political Science – How to Measure the Goodness of a Political System

Authors

Abstract

As is well known, David Easton defines the political system as emerging from those social interactions undertaken in relation to the authoritative allocation of values for a society. This paper explains two normative services that Easton’s definition can provide for political science; one is explanatory, the other evaluative. The explanatory service is to show both the distinctiveness of political science as a social science and to serve as a standard, or norm, by which to set the boundaries of the profession’s subject matter. Secondly, Easton’s theory of the political system as an input/output model can serve as a standard by which to assess the “goodness” of a political system, and for comparing the goodness of systems. Assessing such goodness is not a matter of moral approval or approbation, but more like the taxonomist assessing the goodness of a specimen, as to both its categorical fit and its health.

Content

Thumbnail image of APSA Preprint Sept 2021.pdf

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Log in or register with APSA to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .