Presidential Voting and County Composition; A Research Note on the 2020 Election

02 August 2021, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

We investigate the 2020 Presidential Election by using the county as the unit of analysis (n= 3,112) and examine the variance in the county percentage of votes cast for Biden and Trump as dependent variables. Our seven independent variables are conceptually related to racial diversity, educational attainment, wellbeing (includes economic, health, and quality-of-life indicators), and rural/urban classification. Using OLS regression, the model explains about 73% (R squared) of the variance in county vote outcome for both the Biden and Trump models. The regression results show that the counties that Trump won tended to be populated with people who are more white, less educated, score lower on a composite wellbeing measure and are located in a more rural setting compared to the counties that Biden won. However, the urban/rural effect is so small that we question whether there is a real effect after controlling for the effects of other variables.

Keywords

2020 Election
County analysis
Presidential voting

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.