International Relations

Why African Norms Matter: Subsidiarity and Agency in Peacemaking

Authors

Abstract

This article explains the problem facing the UN and African regional organizations in applying the principle of subsidiarity in peacemaking. It draws on the concept of norm subsidiarity and examines African norm-setting instruments. It argues that the African Union is a subsidiary actor in the global order, making parallel but distinct norms to export globally, retain autonomy, claim primacy, and deflect implementing uncomfortable external principles. Conversely, African subregional organizations are localizing actors, willing to accept or modify global and regional rules. The significance is that existing studies assume that the AU is or should be a localizing agent, as Chapter VIII of the UN Charter anticipated. Essentially, current studies have subsumed African norms under international rules, denying the importance of African rule-making power. This study shows that African norms underpin subsidiarity and agency in peacemaking and therefore matter. This article contributes to the scholarship on African agency in international relations.

Version notes

This version refines the central argument, methodology, and contributions to knowledge.

Content

Thumbnail image of Why African Norms Matter.pdf

Comments

Log in or register with APSA to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .