Public Law and Courts

Where Have the Guardians Gone? Law Enforcement and the Politics of Supranational Forbearance in the European Union



Why would a supranational law enforcer suddenly refrain from wielding its powers? We theorize the supranational politics of forbearance– the deliberate under-enforcement of the law– and distinguish them from domestic forbearance. We explain why an exemplary supranational enforcer– the European Commission– became reluctant to launch infringements against European Union member states. While the Commission’s legislative role as “engine of integration” has been controversial, its enforcement role as “guardian of the Treaties” has been viewed as less contentious. Yet after 2004, infringements launched by the Commission plummeted. Triangulating between infringement statistics and elite interviews, we trace how the Commission grew alarmed that aggressive enforcement was jeopardizing intergovernmental support for its policy proposals. By embracing dialogue with governments over robust enforcement, the Commission sacrificed its role as guardian of the Treaties to safeguard its role as engine of integration. Our analysis holds broader implications for the study of forbearance in international organizations.


Thumbnail image of Kelemen&Pavone_WhereHavetheGuardiansGone_Final_Dec21_APSAPreprints_MainText.pdf

Supplementary material

Thumbnail image of Kelemen&Pavone_WhereHavetheGuardiansGone_Final_Dec21_APSAPreprints_Appendices.pdf
Data and Transparency Appendices for “Where Have the Guardians Gone?”
This file contains a data appendix (containing additional statistics on infringement actions lodged by the European Commission) and a transparency appendix (or TRAX, with annotated citations and excerpts of qualitative interviews) for the working paper, “Where Have the Guardians Gone? Law Enforcement and Supranational Forbearance in the European Union.”


Log in or register with APSA to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .