State intervention and the labyrinth of communal conflict in Ghana: How Kwame Nkrumah missed the opportunity to address the Bawku conflict

01 February 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Most scholarly accounts assert that governments’ conflict resolution and peacebuilding efforts fail to address the root causes, prolong, or worsen the conflict situation. This supposed failure arises mainly because state actors pursue strategic interests in the peace processes, which provokes adversarial inter-and intra-group relations, especially in Africa where communal conflicts remain a great threat to economies and security. Nonetheless, the discussions fail to adequately investigate the details of state interventions and how they affect the potential for peace in some notorious conflict-affected areas. This paper examines how the Opoku-Afari Committee Report, the government of Ghana’s first official response to the Bawku conflict in 1957, protracts and further complicates the conflict. findings further the existing knowledge on the conflict by drawing out specifics of the state failure which are usually obscured in the literature.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.