A Realistic Analysis of the Stuxnet Cyber-attack

09 March 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

This paper presented a realistic analysis of Stuxnet cyber-attack, aiming to uncover the complexities associated with the launch decision-making process. It managed to answer the question: Why were Stuxnet cyber-attack adopted, as a strategic choice for managing the conflict instead of traditional choices? It also gave an understanding for the security challenges and the strategic implications that cyber-attack had to pose. Finally, it reached a number of conclusions to the effect that: Realism, as a theory mostly concerned with issues of national security and power, can be a very suitable theoretical framework for analyzing and understanding cyber-attacks. The analysis confirmed that realism is an appropriate framework for identifying important issues related to security in the cyberspace and can provide useful insights into some of the enduring characteristics of international relations in the cyberspace.

Keywords

Cyberwar
Cyber-attack
Stuxnet
Realism
International Relations
Iran
Israel

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.