State Voting Restrictions and State Fraud Cases

12 April 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The research tests whether more restrictive election laws reduce incidents of election cheating. Using a “cost of voting index,” with state-specific values, as a proxy for a more restrictive electoral-institutional climate, and incidents of fraud culled from the Heritage Foundation website, the research looks for a match. Importantly, there are many different types of fraud to consider. Specifically, the research distinguishes two broad categories. To avoid duplicitous election outcomes, it is important to understand the distinct threats that different types of fraud entail and the research provides a theoretical discussion of the dissimilarities. Empirically, the research does not find a negative relationship between voting restrictions and either category of fraud. In other words, there is not more Voter or Election Fraud reported, where voting is easier.

Keywords

Voter Fraud
Election Law

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.