Leadership Continuity, Cosponsor Cues, and Bill Advancement in State Legislatures

14 April 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

While many studies of state legislatures have considered collective levels of experience due to term limits or turnover, little research has focused specifically on turnover at the highest levels of legislative leadership. Continuity in legislative leadership varies tremendously across state legislatures, from leaders who serve for a generation to chambers where every session features a new speaker or president. In this paper, I ask whether leadership experience has ramifications in the policymaking process, and especially with respect to the floor agenda. More specifically, I ask whether the linkage between cosponsor cues and bill success differs for experienced and inexperienced leaders. Looking at bills considered in 26 state legislative lower chambers from 2012-2020, I find no evidence of differences between new and continuing leaders, indicating that leaders quickly learn to use cosponsor cues and that this aspect of legislative turnover does not meaningfully inhibit legislative productivity.

Keywords

state legislatures
turnover
leadership
bill passage
cues
cosponsorship
learning
productivity

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.