Issue Responsiveness in Canadian Politics: Are Parties Responsive to the Climate Change’s Public Salience in Question Period?

06 July 2022, Version 1


Are political representatives responsive to their constituents in determining the issues they address? Our paper takes a novel approach to this critical question using innovative data and state-of-the-art methodology. While most previous research on issue responsiveness has looked at the United States and its unique political institutions, we study a multi-party, parliamentary setting: Canada. We focus our analysis on two prominent issues: the environment and climate change. Using transcripts from the House of Commons’ Question Period from 2006 to 2021, we measure the attention political parties attribute to the various issues. We use Google Trends data to measure policy issues’ public salience. We implement an instrumental variable estimation strategy to identify and estimate how the environment and climate change’s public salience drives elite attention. Our analysis demonstrates that public salience significantly affects political parties’ interest in the environment and climate change but unveils appreciable partisan heterogeneity in this regard.



Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.