Citizen Mobility, Lockdowns, and the Limits of Political Leadership

08 July 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

This article addresses the effectiveness of government mandates on citizen mobility and whether mandated lockdowns contained the Covid-19 virus from March 2020-June 2021. All states and nations in this study (with the exception of Sweden) used legal strictures to constrain mobility in attempting to contain Covid-19 hospitalizations and deaths per million. Of 13 cases examined here there were three statistically significant relationships between mandated lockdowns and hospitalizations and deaths per million, and these correlations are negative. Mandated lockdowns decreased citizens’ movement, but lockdown efficacy decreased over time. State mandated lockdowns did not have a statistically significant impact on decreasing the spread of Covid-19 deaths or hospitalizations. In addition, the more stringent the lockdowns, the greater the economic damage.

Keywords

Covid19
Lockdown
Asia
Europe
US

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.