China: Assessing the Goodness of a Political System with Chinese Characteristics

24 August 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Applying the Hartman-Easton Synthesis this paper illustrates how the goodness of China’s political system can be assessed. Using David Easton’s theory of the political system as if it were an automotive engineer’s blueprint for the expected operation of a motor, the operational goodness of any political system can be assessed as an empirical, rather than moral, matter. Robert S. Hartman, the founder of the science of values (“value science”), has shown that goodness can be assessed in three dimensions. As those pertain to political science, they are, the systemic, or constitutional; the extrinsic, or operational; and the intrinsic, or public sentience. The conclusion addresses the challenge of rendering an over-all, or general, assessment of a political system’s goodness.

Keywords

China
Chinese Politics
the Chinese Political System
Political Systems
David Easton

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.