American Government and Politics

Feeling Out of Place: Who are the Non-Rural Rural Identifiers, and are They Unique Politically?

Authors

Abstract

Previous work suggests rural identity stems from direct experience living in a rural area, and that categorical group membership occurs before social identification. However, some U.S. survey takers not living in a rural area indicate that being rural is part of their identity. Using an original survey of American adults, as well as 2019 and 2020 ANES data, I find that these non-rural rural identifiers are similar to rural identifiers in rural areas in terms of group-based affect and values, and are more right-leaning and populist than people who do not identify as rural (regardless of their location). Few consistent demographic differences between rural and non-rural rural identifiers exist. I conclude that non-rural rural identifiers have either been socialized as rural but moved away, or they affiliate with the values and norms of rural areas despite not categorically being part of the group, leading to rural identification.

Content

Thumbnail image of non-rural rural apsa draft- Lunz Trujillo - combined ms and supplement.pdf

Supplementary material

Thumbnail image of z non-rural rural apsa draft appendix.docx
Supplement for "Feeling out of place"
Supplement for "Feeling out of place"

Comments

Log in or register with APSA to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .