Methodology

Forecasting presidential elections: What about within-mode effects?

Authors

Abstract

Recent elections have shown that polls are not equal in terms of modes of administration (Durand et Johnson, 2021). In the U.S. 2020 election, 51 pollsters published 222 national polls from September 1st to election day. The polls that used mixed-mode or multiple sampling sources produced significantly better estimates of the results than polls using sole opt-in panels. Besides, these polls did not trace similar trends in support for Biden. We compare this situation with the French presidential election where ten pollsters published 126 polls from January 1st to April 8. Almost all the pollsters used opt-in panels, often the same source. One pollster used a more probabilistic method to sample voters. His estimates were significantly different and tended to be higher for the more extreme candidates – on the right and on the left alike. The presentation concludes on the necessity to monitor emerging developments in electoral polls.

Content

Thumbnail image of APSA_Within_mode_differences_CDurand.pdf

Comments

Log in or register with APSA to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .