Pandering Politics: Examining the effect of positive, explicit racial appeals on support for political candidates

06 September 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Though we know that positive racial appeals have increased, it is still unclear whether and when they are considered credible to the target group. This leads to several questions: How do Black constituents respond when white politicians use positive explicit racial appeals? How does this differ from when white politicians use endorsements, rather than explicit appeals? Or when that explicit appeal is combined with an endorsement from a black elite? Focusing on black voters, we seek to understand the conditions under which “positive” explicit racial appeals for white politicians are successful in gaining support. Using an original preregistered experiment on Black Americans, we find that, both positive, explicit appeals to the Black community and receiving endorsements from Black elites increase the white politician’s ratings relative to the control condition. However, we do not find evidence that an endorsement from a Black elite is necessary to facilitate an increase in support.

Keywords

Pandering
Racial appeals
Trust
Black Political Ideology

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.