Subnational governments played a major role addressing the socioeconomic toll of COVID-19. Still, we know little about why some (but not all) adopted generous social assistance measures, and why some of their interventions were more programmatic than others. Based on in-depth case studies of 23 Colombian cities, this article characterizes governments’ aid measures and employs fsQCA to explain differences. I find that no single factor is necessary or sufficient to produce broad or programmatic relief. Various combinations of structural factors and incentives for mayors’ political action are conducive to both outcomes. Electoral competitiveness and mobilization pushed mayors in wealthier, institutionally stronger cities to provide more aid, while opposition mayors delivered significant relief with more limited resources. Structural factors appear especially important for aid to be programmatic (with one exception). The findings call for a less static understanding of state capacity in the study of social policy and distributive politics.
Large and Honest COVID-19 Relief: A Subnational Qualitative Comparative Approach with Evidence from Colombia
11 October 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.