American Government and Politics

Implications of Court Curbing in the US States

Authors

Abstract

State courts decide far more cases than federal courts, impacting the daily lives of state citizens. However, considerably less is known about judicial decision-making among state court judges, particularly when subject to court-curbing activity by other policy-makers. This paper examines the implications of court curbing on the judicial behavior of US state court judges. Court curbing aims to diminish judicial independence and alter the balance of powers among branches of government. However, the extent of influence these attacks have on targeted judiciaries is largely unknown. I argue that judges alter their decision-making around cases based on recent court-curbing activity. Specifically, I utilize two novel measures of court curbing, court-curbing intensity and court-curbing likelihood, which serve as indicators of the levels of potential institutional change to the court and likelihood that a proposal will be enacted. These measures extend beyond the simple counts of court-curbing proposals used in past studies.

Content

Thumbnail image of Catalano_ImplicationsofCCinUSStates_APSA2022.pdf

Comments

Log in or register with APSA to comment
Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] – please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .