“Felicity” and “Makarismos”: Hobbes on Happiness and His Intellectual Sources

14 October 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

I argue that Hobbes recommends a moderate conception of human happiness as secure and calm satisfaction of desires, which makes large-scale achievement of happiness possible in the context of human co-existence. First, I call attention to the importance of “felicity” in Hobbes’ political philosophy and survey its definitions in Hobbes’ works to challenge the prevalent understanding of this concept as inherently expansive and competitive. Second, I consider “felicity” in the structure of Hobbes’ political theory and argue that conceiving felicity as competitive and expansive is the cause of the impasse of the state of nature, while a moderate understanding of it, contained in the laws of nature, is the way to widespread improvement in felicity. In the last two sections, I speculate about the sources of Hobbes’ conception of happiness and highlight the probable influences of Montaigne and of the Greek ethical lesson against understanding happiness as ever greater prosperity.

Keywords

Hobbes
happiness
felicity
laws of nature

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.