A Comparative Analysis of the Principles of Primogeniture Rule and its Position under International Human Rights Law: A Study of Nigeria, South Africa and United Kingdom

14 December 2022, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

The work aims to analyze the principles of primogeniture rule and its position under international human rights law; studying cases in Nigeria, South Africa and United Kingdom. The research used a qualitative research design method which is deemed the ideal design to use within the qualitative methodology because of its ability to facilitate exploration of the phenomenon within its context, using a variety of secondary data. The study collected and analyzed non-numerical data (e.g., text, and video) which are all secondary. It is obvious that the primogeniture system has a negative standing in international human rights legislation. The study discovered that primogeniture rule is still significant and applicable in Nigeria, where it is recognized and applied. Customary law and statutes both directly and indirectly support its application. The work suggests a legal framework to be established to handle any failure to uphold the obligation of assistance and care.

Keywords

Inheritance
Intestate Succession
International Human Rights
Primogeniture

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.