Editor's Choice: Measuring Candidate Quality using Local Newspaper Endorsements

05 May 2023, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

I construct a new measure of candidate quality using political endorsements made by local newspapers. Similar to expert opinions, newspaper editorial board endorsements are highly-informed judgements that reflect quality differences between candidates, once accounting for the partisan preferences of the newspapers. Using a new data set of over 22,000 local newspaper endorsements, I simultaneously estimate the quality differences between candidates in thousands of elections between 1950-2022 along with a dynamic measure of the partisan slant of hundreds of local newspapers across the United States. After validating the endorsement-based measures of quality and slant, I use the quality differential measure to assess the effect that candidate quality has on election results and governing performance. I conclude by discussing how the newspaper endorsement-based measures have a strong potential to help advance our understanding of the impact of candidate quality and media bias on political representation.

Keywords

Electoral Politics
Representation
Candidate Quality
Newspaper Endorsements

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.