Post-Populism: Transitions from Populist to Personalist Authoritarian Rule

23 August 2023, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Populism is a political strategy in which political leaders directly mobilize support through mass communication, typically posing as the opponents of an entrenched political elite. Although a growing body of research shows that populists draw on their mass support to weaken executive constraints, less attention has been given to what follows this populist turn. Specifically, under what circumstances are populists capable of leveraging their erstwhile mass support into authoritarian rule over the long-term? In contrast to other studies that put the durability of formal and informal democratic institutions to the fore, and unlike most current research on populism, drawing on detailed studies of Vladimir Putin in Russia and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey, we explain the personalization of power under populist leadership by examining how such leaders manage other elites; that is, we place the degree, timing, and nature of elite cohort replacement at the center of our argument.

Keywords

populism
authoritarianism

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.