Choosing the Right Court: Forum Shopping for Litigating International Investment Disputes

29 August 2023, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

With increased transnational investment activities, multinational firms and states find their interests conflicted and decide to litigate disputes in international investment disputes courts. Given that there are multiple venues to settle international investment disputes, which court do firms and governments choose and why? We argue that investors tend to choose a system to maximize their interests, and thus consider characteristics of the respondent country and the characteristics of industries that they included. We empirically find that investors tend to proceed with ICSID rule when respondent countries have less direct control their economy and when home and respondent ties are weak.

Keywords

Investor-state dispute settlement
Forum Shopping
Investor's strategic action

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.