Abstract
On the recent Bletchley summit, some British officials had hoped other countries would agree to establish a UK based AI task force, to test new models from around the world before they are released to the public. But instead, Raimondo used the summit to announce a separate American AI Safety Institute within the country's National Institute of Standards and Technology.
This article explores the need for international and collaborative effort, led by the new American AI Safety Institute, on regualting AI systems to be more ethical , and to safeguard individual privacy while complying with existing privacy standards. The study concludes that these algorithms effectively enhance privacy protection while balancing the utility of AI with the need to protect personal data. This requires a comprehensive approach that combines technological innovation with ethical and regulatory strategies to harness the power of AI in a way that respects and protects individual privacy.
Supplementary materials
Title
Ethics and Responsible AI Deployment
Description
During a recent interview, UK minister Amanda Solloway and US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo praised the partnership between the UK and the US safety institute, dismissing any suggestion of a split between the two countries on which country should take the global lead on AI regulation. Meanwhile, the EU is passing an AI bill to develop a set of principles for regulation and bring in rules for specific technologies, such as live facial recognition.
Actions
Supplementary weblinks
Title
Ethics and Responsible AI Deployment
Description
On the first day of the AI safety summit, the UK, US, EU, Australia, and China signed the Bletchley Declaration - the first international agreement to deal with the rapidly emerging technology, artificial intelligence (AI). The 28 governments that signed the declaration acknowledged that AI poses a potentially catastrophic risk to humanity. They agreed to collaborate on AI safety research and work together to regulate AI development, despite signs of competition between the US and the UK to take the lead in developing new regulations. However, there currently needs to be more international agreement on what a global set of AI regulations might look like or who should draw them up. Some British officials had hoped other countries would agree to strengthen the government's AI task force to test new models from around the world before they are released to the public.
Actions
View