The Generalizability of IR Experiments Beyond the U.S.

18 March 2024, Version 3
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Theories of IR typically make predictions intended to hold across many countries. Nonetheless, existing experimental evidence testing the micro-foundations of IR theories relies overwhelmingly on studies fielded in the U.S. We argue that the nature of what constitutes a theory of IR makes it especially important to know whether particular findings hold across countries. To examine the generalizability of IR experimental findings beyond the U.S., we implemented a pre-registered and harmonized multi-site replication study, fielding four prominent IR experiments in seven countries: Brazil, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, Nigeria, and the U.S. We find that all four experiments replicate in nearly all of the countries, a pattern likely due to limited treatment effect heterogeneity. Our study reveals that findings from the U.S. are similar to findings from a wide range of democracies, offering important theoretical and empirical implications to inform the design and interpretation of future experimental research in IR.

Keywords

International Relations
Experiments
Generalizability
Replication
Meta-analysis
Public Opinion

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.