Sanctions and Democracy: The Limits of Peace

27 March 2024, Version 4
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Scholars have argued whether democratic peace also holds in the realm of economic sanctions – whether there is an economic peace. Substantial amount of evidence has been gathered both for and against economic peace. This article provides a new insight, with the use of the updated TIES data set on sanctions and two data sets on democracy (Polity IV and V-Dem), into the topic of economic peace. It finds that democracies are both more likely to issue economic sanctions and that there is no economic peace. In fact, the opposite holds and democracies are more likely to sanction one another. This study indicates that economic coercion in international relations is driven by the constraints and incentives that public opinion and interests groups place on democratic leaders.

Keywords

Economic Peace
Democratic Peace
Economic Sanctions
Democracy
Conflict

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.