‘Good’ Governance and Reports of Ongoing Environmental Conflicts

22 August 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Conflict is a feature of all pluralistic societies (Ury, 2024). At times conflict can be severe and, unfortunately, violent (Walter, 2022). Consequently, conflict theorists have been interested in how various economic, social, and environmental factors influence the prevalence of that phenomenon (Stares, 2017). This study explores patterns between well-known governance indicators and newly created data on unresolved environmental conflicts reported within 144 countries from 2004 to 2014. Following exploratory analysis of conflicts documented in the Environmental Justice Atlas, models were tested that regressed national case counts against the Worldwide Governance Indicators and several control variables. Modeling revealed that several of the governance variables had significant relationships with conflict counts, including political voice and accountability, rule of law, and control of corruption. These findings suggest that the frequency of ongoing environmental conflicts in the country years studied were significantly related to the perceived quality of ‘good’ governance in those country years.

Keywords

Environmental Conflict
Rule of Law
Voice and Accountability
Control of Corruption
Conflict Ecology
Political Ecology

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.