Is Gender Diplomacy Effective? Women’s Representation and Public Diplomacy in Authoritarian Regimes

04 September 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Extant scholarship suggests that autocrats employ quotas to cultivate an image of democratic governance, yet the mechanisms underlying these effects are underexplored. We conceptualize Gender Diplomacy (GD) as the strategic deployment of women in public diplomacy to enhance foreign perceptions. We conducted a nationally representative survey, randomly exposing 1,241 Americans to vignettes and photos depicting either an all male or a gender balanced Federal National Council in the UAE. Our findings reveal that GD improves perceptions in domains associated with stereotypically female traits, including viewing the UAE positively, but weaker effects in domains associated with male competencies, such as support for security cooperation. We argue that these effects are due to the implicit association between female traits and the UAE. Our research underscores the role of implicit gender biases in public diplomacy and informs debates on the strategic use of women's inclusion.

Keywords

Electoral gender quotas
Women’s representation
Legislative politics
Public opinion
Survey experiment
Public diplomacy
International relations
Middle East and North Africa

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.