Lessons from the United States: Improving Accreditation and Quality Assurance in CEMAC Higher Education

26 September 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

This study compares higher education accreditation and quality assurance systems in the United States (U.S.) and Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC) countries, highlighting the potential for selective adaptation of the U.S. model to improve the CEMAC higher education landscape. A comparative policy analysis approach was used, which included legal texts, policy documents, reports, and scientific publications from CEMAC higher education organisations and subregional entities as well as U.S. government and accreditation bodies. The data reveals that the U.S. system excels in financial stability, openness, and constant quality improvement, while CEMAC countries, on the other hand, confront obstacles as a result of weak legislative frameworks, varying accrediting requirements, and limited financial resources. Higher education institutions in CEMAC could enhance their credibility and performance by adopting U.S. standards, such as expedited accreditation procedures and enhanced regulatory monitoring, while also taking into account the unique challenges of their respective countries.

Keywords

Authorisation
CEMAC Subregion
Higher Education Reform
Quality Assurance
Accreditation

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.