Propaganda by Proxy: How Autocrats Use Surrogates to Conceal Their Control of the Media

02 October 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Autocrats use the media to generate popular support, yet individuals opposed to the regime tend to distrust and avoid state-owned sources. How do autocrats reach these skeptical actors? In this paper, I examine a strategy in which autocrats control private media outlets through proxies, thereby concealing these outlets' connections to the government and rendering them more credible to regime opponents. Fielding surveys in four Sub-Saharan African countries, I find that the vast majority of citizens living in autocracies are unable to identify which private outlets are owned by regime proxies. I then present evidence from a series of field experiments showing that concealed ownership works: it makes opponents more likely to consume regime-controlled news sources and more likely to be persuaded by their pro-regime coverage. These results challenge the notion that propaganda only influences an autocrat's loyal supporters, pointing to conditions under which it reaches and persuades more discerning audiences.

Keywords

autocracy
media
propaganda
authoritarian
persuasion
regime support
news
experiment
information
non-democracy
Africa
public opinion

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.