Belaying the Inevitable: On Intellectual Collaboration in the Anthropocene

10 October 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

We argue that inheritors of Euro-modernity must find new ways of engaging perspectives that have been coercively displaced by the very modernising forces that now imperil the viability of all human societies. We elaborate two models of cross-cultural engagement: (1) philosophical ‘braiding' (Allard-Tremblay, 2022), per which disagreements between traditions are thematised without merging, and the possibility of irresolvable contradiction is acknowledged. Lingering concerns about appropriation and epistemic 'tourism' are then addressed by the secondary model of philosophical ‘belaying' (2). In its non-metaphorical capacity, 'belaying' is a facet of mountaineering safety, whereby the climber and the belayer mitigate the danger of falling by deploying orchestrated tension and friction through hitches and anchors. In both cases, the goal is to facilitate new self-understandings and unexpected constellations of ideas from within one’s own philosophical perspective—asking why ‘we’ persist in conducting our research or teaching in the manner that ‘we’ do.

Keywords

Indigenous thought
Critical Theory
Anthropocene
Philosophical methodologies

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.