Being Careful with Conjoints: Accounting for Inattentiveness in Conjoint Experiments

11 October 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

In typical survey experiments–i.e., experiments that involve a relatively limited amount of manipulated content–respondent inattentiveness tends to biase treatment effect estimates toward zero. Such bias may be even more pronounced in conjoint experiments, which require respondents to attend to an even larger amount of manipulated content. And yet, little research has investigated strategies of accounting for inattentiveness in conjoint experiments specifically. In this study, we explore potential ways to both measure–and account for–respondent inattentiveness when estimating causal effects in both single- and two-profile conjoint experiments. Replicating published conjoint experiments with large national samples, we demonstrate how researchers can implement a simple strategy using pre-treatment measures of attentiveness. Toward this end, we propose a novel method– “conjoint attention checks” (CACs)–to both measure respondents’ attentiveness to conjoint profiles and provide for more robust tests of hypotheses in conjoint experiments.

Keywords

conjoint
attentiveness
experiment
satisficing

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.