A Solution to the Seat-Product Problem: The Square Root Rule of Elections

19 November 2024, Version 3
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Seat-product models of the effective number of parties offer our best explanation for why party-systems fragment. Yet they rely on a simplification. Rather than model the effective number of parties writ large, they models this index using the largest party alone. This induces a positive bias, since small parties have a suppressive effect. I show that we can derive new seat-product models without need for this simplification. The key is to recognise that the effective number of parties is information theoretic in nature. This lets us use well-known information theoretic identities to avoid party shares altogether. Further, this process produces an interesting by-product: a new “root rule” of elections. Just like the cube root of a nation's population approximates the number of seats in its assembly, I show that the square root of the actual number of parties approximates the effective number of parties as well.

Keywords

Logical Models
Seat-Product Model
Effective Number of Parties
Party-System Fragmentation

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.