Did Citizens United Cause Democratic Backsliding?

19 November 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Prior research has found that Citizens United—which legalized unlimited independent expenditures by corporations—has moved public policy in a more conservative pro-business direction. We argue that Citizens United may have had an even more fundamental effect on the institutions of American democracy itself. More specifically, we argue that Citizens United has on net favored the Republican Party electorally, and that the Republican Party has used this increased leverage to engage in democratic backsliding. Using a state-level difference-in-differences design we find that Citizens United (which forced 23 states to remove pre-existing limitations on independent expenditures but left the other 27 states untouched) induced a significant decline in the freeness and fairness of state elections. The effect is largely explained by Citizens United tipping several close elections in favor of Republicans just before the 2010 electoral redistricting cycle, which enabled significant Republican gerrymandering and voter suppression.

Keywords

Democratic backsliding
Money in Politics
American Politics

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.