Beyond the glass ceiling, more 'housework'? Womens' work assignment, performance and influence in political institutions

02 December 2024, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

Women remain under-represented in many political institutions. To what extent does the under-representation of women impact their performance, and the amount influence they have within political institutions? I argue that women have a harder time getting (s)elected because of gender-based selection bias and that those women who are (s)elected perform, on average, better than their male counterparts. Yet, women have less influence because gender-based selection bias may also exist within the institutions to which women have been (s)elected to serve. I empirically assess my argument in the context of the Court of Justice of the European Union. I find that women judges are assigned the judicial “housework”, while male judges are assigned the groundbreaking cases, resulting in a gender gap in influence. Yet, my results also show that women perform on average better than their male counterparts and complete their cases faster.

Keywords

Gender representation
Courts
Judicial politics

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.