Bill Reintroduction in the U.S. House

01 April 2025, Version 2
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

What happens to bills that do not become laws in a given Congress? Which of these bills are reintroduced in the next Congress, and why? Answering these questions is increasingly important, as it becomes ever more difficult for a bill to advance through all legislative stages and become law. In this paper, we propose a theory of bill reintroduction from a utility perspective. We posit that MCs value both the extent and intensity of external support when making the reintroduction decisions. Specifically, we argue that MCs are more likely to reintroduce bills with more cosponsors, especially those with early and committee-based support. We also contend that public and media attention can serve as additional signals of a bill’s value. Using a text reuse approach, we identify reintroduced bills from 2003 to 2023, and we find strong support for the idea that both elite and public cues shape strategic reintroduction decisions.

Keywords

bill reintroduction
cosponsorship
co-partisan support

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.