The Left-Wing Peace & The Right-Wing Peace

29 May 2025, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed at the time of posting.

Abstract

How strong is the nexus between domestic and international politics? The democratic peace contends that democracies do not fight interstate wars against each other. We argue there is also a “left-wing peace” and a “right-wing peace,” where people are less likely to support the use of force against countries that share their left-wing or right-wing ideology. This effect holds independent of whether a foreign country is democratic or nondemocratic. Observers view out-ideology states as more threatening than in-ideology states due to out-group bias, which is exacerbated by increasing polarization. Two survey experiments among the American public, and an analysis of militarized interstate disputes, provide strong evidence for our argument. Our theory connects major literatures across political science subfields, including social identity theory, political polarization, and the democratic peace. It significantly contributes to debates about whether politics “stops at the water’s edge” and the impact of polarization on political violence.

Keywords

democratic peace
polarization
left-wing peace
right-wing peace
in-group bias
water's edge
ideology

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.